Last month I had the opportunity to give a presentation to an audience of publishers, STM customers, and providers as part of the Association of American Publishers Learn, Connect, Grow series. The topic was “Finance for Non-Finance Professionals”. The general outline was to walk through, at a high level, the technical particulars of accounting/finance, the concepts around the time value of money and risk/return, and methods for sharing financial information through graphs and charts.

As is often the case with presentations, the portion that worried me the most was the Q&A that would follow. You never really know what you are going to get, and you just hope and pray that one of the questions isn’t a real stumper, causing you to look foolish in front of a group of strangers. Luckily, I was able to navigate through that portion unscathed.

However, there was one very interesting takeaway/reminder for me. Most of the interest and related questions surrounded the concept of time value of money and risk/return. Specifically, there were a number of questions on strategies for justifying projects/expenditures within an organization. Without delving fully into the concept of Time Value of Money, the general theme is that if one invests $____ today, how long does it take to recover or exceed that original investment? While the customers were asking from their point of view, i.e. investing $___ in a project with an expectation of earning $___ over a period of time, that’s also how we would look at it internally Silverchair. Thus, we are aligned.

As I reflected on the event while on the train home, it got me to thinking more about how the audience questions relate to Silverchair. There is a big difference between being a “provider” and a “partner” (beyond the recent Scholarly Kitchen article). A provider will deliver the request of the customer and bill them. This is why at home we call our cable company a “provider” – it’s largely a one-way subscription relationship and transactional. A partner relationship has a different connotation, more mutual in nature. The tenor of the questions reminded me how important it is that we continue to view ourselves as a partner and not become a provider. It’s what differentiates Silverchair from our competitors.

Our ability to help our customers develop, write, and tell their business/financial stories on their side, as much if not more so than our own, is really important for us. As a finance person whose role can often feel “transactional” (account, bill, collect, etc.), this event was a great reminder for me about our marketplace and where we fit.

Brian Fitzgerald, Director of Finance & Administration

1993 1999 2000s 2010 2017 calendar facebook instagram landscape linkedin news pen stats trophy twitter zapnito

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy